LESSON PLAN

check
check
check

Lesson plan

Level B2

Nature Versus Nurture: How Genetics and Environment Shape Us

Lesson overview

The nature versus nurture debate explores how genetics and environment shape our personalities. Recent studies reveal that while genetics influence traits, environmental factors significantly impact their expression.

Reading text

READING TEXT

When we think about the debate of nature versus nurture, we find ourselves at a crossroads. One path leads us into the genetic forest, while the other guides us through the nurturing fields of upbringing and environment. The big question is: how much do our genes decide who we become? Recent studies are revealing interesting truths about how both heredity and environment shape our personalities.

The nature versus nurture debate has been important in psychology for many years. Supporters of the nature argument believe that our genetic makeup is the main builder of our personalities. They say that traits like temperament, intelligence, and some behaviors are hardwired into our DNA, passed down from our ancestors. On the other hand, those who support the nurture side argue that our environment, experiences, and upbringing are crucial in shaping who we are. This includes parental influence, cultural context, and social interactions.

So, where does the truth lie? Recent research shows that the reality is more complex than a simple choice. For example, studies of twins provide fascinating insights into the genetic part of personality. Identical twins, who share almost 100% of their genetic material, often show similar personality traits, even when raised apart. This suggests that genetics play a significant role in shaping who we are. However, the story does not end there.

Consider the role of the environment. While genetics may set the stage, it is often our experiences that determine how we perform in life. For instance, a child born with a genetic tendency toward extroversion may not develop those traits if raised in a restrictive or isolating environment. On the other hand, an introverted child might thrive in a nurturing setting that encourages social interaction. This relationship shows that while our genes provide a blueprint, it is the environment that adds the details.

Let’s explore this relationship further. The concept of epigenetics has changed our understanding of how genes and environment interact. Epigenetics studies changes in gene expression that do not involve changes to the DNA sequence. This means that environmental factors, such as stress, diet, and exposure to toxins, can influence how our genes are expressed. Imagine a garden where soil quality, sunlight, and water determine how flowers bloom. In this metaphor, our genes are the seeds, and the environment is the garden itself.

Moreover, this research has implications beyond individual personalities. If we accept that both nature and nurture shape who we are, we must consider how this understanding can inform education, mental health, and social policy. For example, if we recognize that a child’s environment can impact their genetic potential, we might advocate for more equitable access to resources that support healthy development, like quality education and supportive family structures.

We should also remember the stories of individuals who have overcome challenges due to supportive mentors or transformative experiences. These narratives highlight the power of nurture in overcoming genetic predispositions. For instance, consider a young person from a disadvantaged background who, through a caring teacher's influence, discovers a passion for science and becomes a leading researcher. This shows how environmental factors can unlock potential, suggesting that while our genes may set certain limits, it is often our experiences that allow us to go beyond them.

As we navigate this complex web of genetics and environment, we must also face some uncomfortable truths. The idea that our personalities can change raises questions about accountability and identity. If our behaviors can be traced back to genetic predispositions or environmental influences, what does this mean for our sense of self? Are we merely products of our biology and upbringing, or do we have the ability to shape our destinies? This inquiry invites us to reflect on the moral implications of our understanding of human behavior.

In conclusion, the nature versus nurture debate is not a simple choice but a complex interplay of genetic and environmental factors that shape our personalities. While our genes provide the foundation, it is the nurturing environment that often determines how we build upon that foundation. As research continues, it becomes clear that understanding this relationship is crucial for individuals and society. By acknowledging the roles of both nature and nurture, we can promote a more compassionate and informed approach to personal development, education, and social policy. In the grand tapestry of human experience, it is the threads of both genetics and environment that create the rich patterns of our lives.

Discussion prompts

DISCUSSION PROMPTS

  • 1. Do you believe that nature or nurture has a greater impact on personality? Why?
  • 2. Can you think of examples from your life where nurture played a significant role in your development?
  • 3. How can understanding the nature versus nurture debate help improve education systems?
  • 4. What are the implications of believing that our personalities are shaped by both genetics and environment?
  • 5. How do you think society can better support individuals based on the findings of this debate?

Key vocabulary

Match each numbered word with the correct lettered definition.

Words

  • 1. debate
  • 2. genetic
  • 3. environment
  • 4. upbringing
  • 5. potential
  • 6. influence
  • 7. traits
  • 8. research
  • 9. experience
  • 10. accountability
  • 11. society
  • 12. nurturing

Definitions

  • a. The capacity to have an effect on someone or something.
  • b. The fact or condition of being responsible.
  • c. Practical contact with and observation of facts or events.
  • d. The systematic investigation into a subject.
  • e. A community of people living together.
  • f. A discussion or argument about a particular topic.
  • g. Relating to genes or heredity.
  • h. Providing care and encouragement.
  • i. The surroundings or conditions in which a person lives or operates.
  • j. The way a child is raised.
  • k. Characteristics or qualities of a person.
  • l. The ability to develop, grow, or improve.

MULTIPLE CHOICE

MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTIONS

Question 1

What is the main topic of the article?

  • a) A) Nature versus nurture
  • b) B) Genetic research
  • c) C) Child development
  • d) D) Psychological theories
Question 2

Which side argues that genetics shape our personalities?

  • a) A) Nurture advocates
  • b) B) Nature advocates
  • c) C) Environmentalists
  • d) D) Psychologists
Question 3

What does epigenetics study?

  • a) A) Changes in DNA sequence
  • b) B) Changes in gene expression
  • c) C) Genetic inheritance
  • d) D) Environmental factors
Question 4

What can influence how our genes are expressed?

  • a) A) Only genetics
  • b) B) Only environment
  • c) C) Both genetics and environment
  • d) D) None of the above
Question 5

What is one implication of the nature versus nurture debate?

  • a) A) It has no impact on society
  • b) B) It can inform social policy
  • c) C) It is only about individual behavior
  • d) D) It is a simple choice

TRUE / FALSE

TRUE / FALSE QUESTIONS

Question 1

The article states that genetics play a significant role in shaping personality. True or False?

  • True
  • False
Question 2

The nurture side believes that environment has no impact on personality. True or False?

  • True
  • False
Question 3

Epigenetics only focuses on genetic changes. True or False?

  • True
  • False
Question 4

The article suggests that nurturing can help overcome genetic predispositions. True or False?

  • True
  • False
Question 5

The nature versus nurture debate is a simple dichotomy. True or False?

  • True
  • False

SHORT ANSWER

SHORT ANSWER QUESTIONS

Question 1

What is the main argument of the nature side in the debate?

Question 2

How can the environment influence a child's development?

Question 3

What role do mentors play in personal development according to the article?

Question 4

What does the article suggest about the relationship between genetics and environment?

Question 5

Why is understanding the nature versus nurture debate important for society?

GRAMMAR EXERCISES

GRAMMAR

Grammar Point: Past Modal Deduction (must/might/could have)

Why this point appears in the article: The article discusses how genetics and environment shape our personalities, which involves making deductions about past influences on behavior and traits. What learners need to understand: Past modals like "must have," "might have," and "could have" are used to express deductions or possibilities about past events. "Must have" indicates a strong assumption based on evidence, while "might have" suggests a weaker possibility, and "could have" implies a potential that was not realized. Common errors include using these forms interchangeably without considering the degree of certainty.

Exercises:

Fill in the blank
Complete the sentences using the correct past modal form (must have/might have/could have).

  1. Identical twins, who share almost 100% of their genetic material, __________ similar personality traits, even when raised apart.
  2. A child born with a genetic tendency toward extroversion __________ developed those traits if raised in a nurturing environment.

Sentence transformation
Rewrite the sentences using the past modal as indicated.
3. It is likely that the child did not develop extroverted traits. (might have)
→ The child __________ extroverted traits.
4. It is certain that genetics play a significant role in shaping personalities. (must have)
→ Genetics __________ a significant role in shaping personalities.

Error correction
Identify and correct the error in the following sentences.
5. The research could have shown that environment is unimportant in personality development.
6. They must have believed that nurture has no effect on personality.

Short guided paragraph with multiple gaps
Fill in the blanks with the appropriate past modal forms (must have/might have/could have).
7. The debate about nature versus nurture __________ been ongoing for many years. Some researchers __________ overlooked the importance of environment in shaping behavior.

Answer key

KEY VOCABULARY

  • 1. debate → f
  • 2. genetic → g
  • 3. environment → i
  • 4. upbringing → j
  • 5. potential → l
  • 6. influence → a
  • 7. traits → k
  • 8. research → d
  • 9. experience → c
  • 10. accountability → b
  • 11. society → e
  • 12. nurturing → h

MULTIPLE CHOICE

  • 1. A) Nature versus nurture
  • 2. B) Nature advocates
  • 3. B) Changes in gene expression
  • 4. C) Both genetics and environment
  • 5. B) It can inform social policy

TRUE / FALSE

  • 1. True
  • 2. False
  • 3. False
  • 4. True
  • 5. False

SHORT ANSWER QUESTIONS

  • 1. The nature side argues that our genetic makeup is the primary architect of our personalities.
  • 2. The environment can provide experiences that shape personality traits and behaviors.
  • 3. Mentors can provide support and guidance that help individuals overcome challenges.
  • 4. The article suggests that both genetics and environment interact to shape our personalities.
  • 5. It helps inform approaches to education, mental health, and social policy.

GRAMMAR EXERCISES

Answer Key:

  1. must have — This indicates a strong assumption based on the evidence of identical twins showing similar traits.
  2. might have — This suggests a possibility that the child could have developed those traits under different circumstances.
  3. might have not developed — This transformation captures the weaker possibility implied in the original sentence.
  4. must have played — This transformation reflects the certainty implied in the original sentence about genetics.
  5. must be corrected to "The research could not have shown that environment is unimportant in personality development." — The original implies a strong certainty that is not supported by the context.
  6. must be corrected to "They must have believed that nurture has an effect on personality." — The original incorrectly states that nurture has no effect, which contradicts the article's argument.
  7. must have / might have — The first blank indicates certainty about the debate's duration, while the second suggests a possibility that researchers may have overlooked the environment.

Grammar Point: Narrative Tenses (past simple/continuous/perfect interplay)

Why this point appears in the article: The article discusses how both genetics and environment influence personality, requiring the use of various past tenses to convey complex relationships and timelines. What learners need to understand: The interplay of past tenses allows for nuanced storytelling. The past simple describes completed actions, the past continuous sets the scene or describes ongoing actions in the past, and the past perfect indicates actions that occurred before another past action. Common errors include mixing these tenses incorrectly or using them without regard for their specific meanings.

Exercises:

Fill in the blank
Complete the sentences using the correct form of the verb in parentheses.

  1. When the researchers __________ (study) twins, they found that genetics played a significant role.
  2. While they __________ (analyze) the data, they realized the importance of environmental factors.

Sentence transformation
Transform the sentences using the past perfect where appropriate.
3. The researchers found that genetics played a role. (before they published their findings)
→ The researchers __________ that genetics played a role before they published their findings.
4. The twins showed similar traits. (when they were raised apart)
→ The twins __________ similar traits when they were raised apart.

Error correction
Identify and correct the error in the following sentences.
5. The researchers was studying the twins when they discovered important information.
6. They have found that environment influences personality before they conducted further studies.

Jumbled sentence reordering
Reorder the words to form a correct sentence.
7. twins / similar / showed / traits / the / when / raised / apart / they.
8. the / researchers / discovered / important / information / while / studying / they.

Answer Key:

  1. studied — The past simple is used here to indicate a completed action.
  2. were analyzing — The past continuous describes the ongoing action of analyzing data.
  3. had found — The past perfect indicates that the finding occurred before the publication.
  4. showed — The past simple is appropriate here to describe the completed action of showing traits.
  5. must be corrected to "The researchers were studying the twins when they discovered important information." — The subject-verb agreement error is corrected.
  6. must be corrected to "They had found that environment influences personality before they conducted further studies." — The past perfect is necessary to indicate the sequence of events.
  7. The twins showed similar traits when raised apart. — This reordering creates a grammatically correct sentence.
  8. The researchers discovered important information while studying. — This reordering creates a grammatically correct sentence.

Grammar Point: Causative Have/Get (have something done)

Why this point appears in the article: The article discusses the influence of environment on personality, which can imply the need for external assistance or intervention in personal development. What learners need to understand: The causative form "have/get something done" is used to indicate that someone arranges for someone else to do something for them. Common errors include using the wrong verb form or misunderstanding the subject of the sentence.

Exercises:

Fill in the blank
Complete the sentences using the correct form of "have" or "get" and the verb in parentheses.

  1. Many parents __________ (have) their children tested for genetic traits.
  2. Schools should __________ (get) students involved in community activities.

Sentence transformation
Rewrite the sentences using the causative form as indicated.
3. The teacher arranged for the students to receive extra tutoring. (have)
→ The teacher __________ extra tutoring for the students.
4. The organization arranged for the children to participate in workshops. (get)
→ The organization __________ the children to participate in workshops.

Error correction
Identify and correct the error in the following sentences.
5. She had her car fixed by a mechanic last week.
6. They get their homework done by their parents every night.

Matching
Match the sentences with their causative forms.
7. a. The parents arranged for the children to be tested.
b. The children received tutoring from a teacher.
c. The teacher helped the students with their projects.
d. The students had their projects completed by the teacher.

Answer Key:

  1. have — This indicates that parents are arranging for the testing to be done.
  2. get — This suggests that schools are encouraging student involvement in activities.
  3. had — This transformation correctly uses the causative form to indicate the teacher arranged for tutoring.
  4. got — This transformation correctly uses the causative form to indicate the organization arranged for participation.
  5. must be corrected to "She had her car fixed by a mechanic last week." — This sentence is correct as is; no change is needed.
  6. must be corrected to "They have their homework done by their parents every night." — The present tense is needed for habitual actions.
  7. a → d, b → c — The causative forms indicate that the parents arranged for the testing, while the children received tutoring, showing the difference in agency.

Already have an account? Log in

Continue with a free account

Get full access to our downloadable lesson plans for free

Create Free Account